The Automated ScoreBook For Soccer

Leaders
  CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  
CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (All games)  
 
SCORING MARGIN GP Offense Defense Margin
1. Richmond 19 2.61 1.09 1.52
2. Lock Haven 20 2.01 1.77 0.24
3. La Salle 18 1.69 1.74 -0.05
4. Temple 22 1.65 2.06 -0.40
5. Massachusetts 18 1.50 1.93 -0.43
6. Saint Joseph's 17 2.07 3.05 -0.98
7. Saint Louis 19 1.11 3.76 -2.65
 
SCORING AVERAGE GP Goals Minutes Avg.
1. Richmond 19 48 1287:12 2.61
2. Saint Joseph's 17 36 1215:01 2.07
3. Lock Haven 20 42 1463:48 2.01
4. La Salle 18 31 1285:49 1.69
5. Temple 22 37 1565:18 1.65
6. Massachusetts 18 28 1305:52 1.50
7. Saint Louis 19 21 1322:54 1.11
 
SHUTOUTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 6 0.32
2. La Salle 18 4 0.22
Temple 22 4 0.18
4. Massachusetts 18 3 0.17
Lock Haven 20 3 0.15
6. Saint Joseph's 17 2 0.12
7. Saint Louis 19 1 0.05
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Richmond 19 20 1287:12 1.09
2. La Salle 18 32 1285:49 1.74
3. Lock Haven 20 37 1463:48 1.77
4. Massachusetts 18 36 1305:52 1.93
5. Temple 22 46 1565:18 2.06
6. Saint Joseph's 17 53 1215:01 3.05
7. Saint Louis 19 71 1322:54 3.76
 
SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Saint Joseph's 17 280 16.47
2. Richmond 19 260 13.68
3. Temple 22 258 11.73
4. Lock Haven 20 255 12.75
5. Massachusetts 18 252 14.00
6. La Salle 18 242 13.44
7. Saint Louis 19 125 6.58
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Saint Joseph's 17 280 16.47
2. Massachusetts 18 252 14.00
3. Richmond 19 260 13.68
4. La Salle 18 242 13.44
5. Lock Haven 20 255 12.75
6. Temple 22 258 11.73
7. Saint Louis 19 125 6.58
 
GOALS SCORED GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 48 2.53
2. Lock Haven 20 42 2.10
3. Temple 22 37 1.68
4. Saint Joseph's 17 36 2.12
5. La Salle 18 31 1.72
6. Massachusetts 18 28 1.56
7. Saint Louis 19 21 1.11
 
GOALS SCORED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 48 2.53
2. Saint Joseph's 17 36 2.12
3. Lock Haven 20 42 2.10
4. La Salle 18 31 1.72
5. Temple 22 37 1.68
6. Massachusetts 18 28 1.56
7. Saint Louis 19 21 1.11
 
GOALS ALLOWED GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 20 1.05
2. La Salle 18 32 1.78
3. Lock Haven 20 37 1.85
Massachusetts 18 37 2.06
5. Temple 22 46 2.09
6. Saint Joseph's 17 53 3.12
7. Saint Louis 19 71 3.74
 
GOALS ALLOWED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 20 1.05
2. La Salle 18 32 1.78
3. Lock Haven 20 37 1.85
4. Massachusetts 18 37 2.06
5. Temple 22 46 2.09
6. Saint Joseph's 17 53 3.12
7. Saint Louis 19 71 3.74
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 37 1.95
2. Lock Haven 20 36 1.80
3. Saint Joseph's 17 26 1.53
4. Temple 22 24 1.09
Massachusetts 18 24 1.33
6. La Salle 18 23 1.28
Saint Louis 19 23 1.21
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 19 37 1.95
2. Lock Haven 20 36 1.80
3. Saint Joseph's 17 26 1.53
4. Massachusetts 18 24 1.33
5. La Salle 18 23 1.28
6. Saint Louis 19 23 1.21
7. Temple 22 24 1.09
 
SAVES GP Saves Avg/G
1. Saint Louis 19 179 9.42
2. La Salle 18 150 8.33
3. Massachusetts 18 120 6.67
4. Temple 22 113 5.14
5. Saint Joseph's 17 110 6.47
6. Lock Haven 20 102 5.10
7. Richmond 19 89 4.68
 
SAVES PER GAME GP Saves Avg/G GA Save%
1. Saint Louis 19 179 9.42 71 .716
2. La Salle 18 150 8.33 32 .824
3. Massachusetts 18 120 6.67 36 .769
4. Saint Joseph's 17 110 6.47 53 .675
5. Temple 22 113 5.14 46 .711
6. Lock Haven 20 102 5.10 37 .734
7. Richmond 19 89 4.68 20 .817
 
PENALTY CORNERS GP No. Avg/G
1. Lock Haven 20 151 7.55
2. Saint Joseph's 17 149 8.76
3. Richmond 19 124 6.53
4. Massachusetts 18 121 6.72
5. La Salle 18 120 6.67
6. Temple 22 115 5.23
7. Saint Louis 19 92 4.84
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. Saint Joseph's 17 11 0.65
2. La Salle 18 10 0.56
3. Richmond 19 8 0.42
4. Lock Haven 20 7 0.35
5. Saint Louis 19 3 0.16
6. Temple 22 2 0.09
Massachusetts 18 2 0.11
 
CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (All games)  
 
Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Massachusetts 5-1-0 .833 16 4   7-11-0 .389 28 37
Richmond 4-1-0 .800 16 6   13-6-0 .684 48 22
Temple 4-2-0 .667 11 7   9-13-0 .409 37 46
La Salle 3-2-0 .600 8 5   8-10-0 .444 31 32
Lock Haven 3-3-0 .500 8 10   10-10-0 .500 42 37
Saint Joseph's 1-5-0 .167 9 22   6-11-0 .353 36 53
Saint Louis 0-6-0 .000 5 19   3-16-0 .158 21 71
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
Richmond 7 7-0-0
Lock Haven 3 3-0-0
La Salle 1 1-0-0
Saint Joseph's 1 1-0-0
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Score-Avg Margin PK-Att Shots Saves Save% Corners
La Salle 18 31-32 1.69-1.74 -0.05 1-2 242 150 82.4 120
Lock Haven 20 42-37 2.01-1.77 +0.24 2-3 255 102 73.4 151
Massachusetts 18 28-36 1.50-1.93 -0.43 1-1 252 120 76.9 121
Richmond 19 48-20 2.61-1.09 +1.52 0-1 260 89 81.7 124
Saint Joseph's 17 36-53 2.07-3.05 -0.98 1-2 280 110 67.5 149
Saint Louis 19 21-71 1.11-3.76 -2.65 2-2 125 179 71.6 92
Temple 22 37-46 1.65-2.06 -0.40 4-5 258 113 71.1 115
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
La Salle 8-1425 178   9-1527 170   1-0 0   18-2952 164
Lock Haven 9-1145 127   10-1084 108   1-33 33   20-2262 113
Massachusetts 7-1345 192   8-1530 191   3-342 114   18-3217 179
Richmond 5-906 181   9-1938 215   5-351 70   19-3195 168
Saint Joseph's 9-1910 212   5-868 174   3-680 227   17-3458 203
Saint Louis 8-748 94   8-1115 139   3-127 42   19-1990 105
Temple 12-4057 338   8-1589 199   2-379 190   22-6025 274
 
  INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  
INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (All games)  
 
To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games,
goalies at least 33.0% of their team's minutes.

SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 85 3.86
2. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 74 4.35
3. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 66 3.30
4. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 64 3.76
5. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 58 3.05
6. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 57 3.00
7. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 53 2.79
8. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 51 2.55
9. YOUNG, Kim-UM 18 47 2.61
10. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 22 46 2.09
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 74 4.35
2. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 85 3.86
3. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 64 3.76
4. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 66 3.30
5. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 58 3.05
6. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 57 3.00
7. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 53 2.79
8. YOUNG, Kim-UM 18 47 2.61
9. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 17 44 2.59
10. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 51 2.55
 
POINTS GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 20 4 44 2.00
2. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 12 36 1.80
3. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 13 7 33 1.65
4. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 10 30 1.58
5. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 10 7 27 1.42
6. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 17 10 3 23 1.35
7. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 10 1 21 1.11
8. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 6 8 20 1.18
9. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 7 4 18 1.06
10. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 4 8 16 0.84
 
POINTS PER GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 20 4 44 2.00
2. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 12 36 1.80
3. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 13 7 33 1.65
4. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 10 30 1.58
5. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 10 7 27 1.42
6. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 17 10 3 23 1.35
7. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 6 8 20 1.18
8. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 10 1 21 1.11
9. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 7 4 18 1.06
10. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 4 8 16 0.84
 
GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 20 0.91
2. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 13 0.65
3. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 0.60
4. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 17 10 0.59
BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 10 0.53
DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 10 0.53
PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 0.53
8. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 7 0.41
9. MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 17 6 0.35
TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 6 0.35
SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 6 0.33
 
GOALS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 20 0.91
2. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 13 0.65
3. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 0.60
4. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 17 10 0.59
5. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 10 0.53
PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 0.53
BARRY, Rebecca-UR 19 10 0.53
8. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 17 7 0.41
9. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 6 0.35
MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 17 6 0.35
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 0.60
2. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 0.53
3. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 8 0.47
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 8 0.42
5. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 7 0.37
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 7 0.35
7. WALSH, Rachel-SJU 17 5 0.29
YOUNG, Kim-UM 18 5 0.28
KUMAR, Neelam-LAS 18 5 0.28
OSTOICH, Catherine-UR 19 5 0.26
BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 22 5 0.23
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 20 12 0.60
2. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 10 0.53
3. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 17 8 0.47
4. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 19 8 0.42
5. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 7 0.37
6. SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 7 0.35
7. WALSH, Rachel-SJU 17 5 0.29
8. KUMAR, Neelam-LAS 18 5 0.28
YOUNG, Kim-UM 18 5 0.28
10. OSTOICH, Catherine-UR 19 5 0.26
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 22 6 0.27
2. AMOROSE, Christina-UR 19 4 0.21
3. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 3 0.16
PETERSON, Katelin-UR 19 3 0.16
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 20 3 0.15
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. HOOVER, Abby-SJU 15 6 0.40
RHULE, Beverly-LHU 20 6 0.30
3. JENNINGS, Haley-LAS 16 4 0.25
4. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 19 3 0.16
SMITH, Lisa-SLU 19 3 0.16
6. LEAMAN, Olivia-LAS 11 2 0.18
KOLOBIELSKI, Sara-SJU 17 2 0.12
DEANER, Jessica-LAS 18 2 0.11
ALLYMOHAMED, Lauren-UM 18 2 0.11
OSTOICH, Catherine-UR 19 2 0.11
 
SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 152 8.44
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 144 8.00
3. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 118 6.56
4. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 103 4.68
5. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 81 4.50
6. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 77 4.81
7. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 53 3.53
8. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 48 4.36
9. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 5 23 4.60
10. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 7 22 3.14
 
SAVES PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 152 8.44
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 144 8.00
3. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 118 6.56
4. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 77 4.81
5. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 103 4.68
6. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 81 4.50
7. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 48 4.36
8. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 53 3.53
 
SHUTOUTS GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 5 0.28
2. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 4 0.22
3. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 3 0.17
4. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 2 0.09
MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 2 0.18
MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 2 0.12
7. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 1 0.06
STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 1 0.07
WENTLING, Kelley-UR 1 1 1.00
 
SHUTOUTS PER GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 5 0.28
2. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 4 0.22
3. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 2 0.18
4. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 3 0.17
5. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 2 0.12
6. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 2 0.09
7. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 1 0.07
8. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 1 0.06
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 20 1217:12 1.15
2. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 21 886:40 1.66
3. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 32 1276:22 1.75
4. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 36 1302:10 1.94
5. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 16 577:08 1.94
6. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 44 1422:44 2.16
7. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 40 1028:51 2.72
8. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 58 1130:33 3.59
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 18 144 32 .818
2. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 18 81 20 .802
3. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 18 118 36 .766
4. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 11 48 16 .750
5. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 18 152 58 .724
6. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 15 53 21 .716
7. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 22 103 44 .701
8. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 16 77 40 .658
 
Team Identification Team ID
La Salle LAS
Lock Haven LHU
Massachusetts UM
Richmond UR
Saint Joseph's SJU
Saint Louis SLU
Temple TU