The Automated ScoreBook For Soccer

Leaders
  CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  
CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (Conference games only)  
 
SCORING MARGIN GP Offense Defense Margin
1. Richmond 5 3.36 1.26 2.10
2. Massachusetts 6 2.63 0.66 1.97
3. Temple 6 1.79 1.14 0.65
4. La Salle 5 1.59 0.99 0.60
5. Lock Haven 6 1.25 1.57 -0.31
6. Saint Joseph's 6 1.44 3.53 -2.09
7. Saint Louis 6 0.85 3.22 -2.37
 
SCORING AVERAGE GP Goals Minutes Avg.
1. Richmond 5 16 333:24 3.36
2. Massachusetts 6 16 426:07 2.63
3. Temple 6 11 429:32 1.79
4. La Salle 5 8 352:39 1.59
5. Saint Joseph's 6 9 436:11 1.44
6. Lock Haven 6 8 446:27 1.25
7. Saint Louis 6 5 412:54 0.85
 
SHUTOUTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 5 2 0.40
La Salle 5 2 0.40
Massachusetts 6 2 0.33
4. Temple 6 1 0.17
5. Saint Louis 6 0 0.00
Lock Haven 6 0 0.00
Saint Joseph's 6 0 0.00
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Massachusetts 6 4 426:07 0.66
2. La Salle 5 5 352:39 0.99
3. Temple 6 7 429:32 1.14
4. Richmond 5 6 333:24 1.26
5. Lock Haven 6 10 446:27 1.57
6. Saint Louis 6 19 412:54 3.22
7. Saint Joseph's 6 22 436:11 3.53
 
SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 118 19.67
2. Temple 6 94 15.67
3. Saint Joseph's 6 86 14.33
4. Richmond 5 79 15.80
5. Lock Haven 6 69 11.50
6. La Salle 5 49 9.80
7. Saint Louis 6 34 5.67
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 118 19.67
2. Richmond 5 79 15.80
3. Temple 6 94 15.67
4. Saint Joseph's 6 86 14.33
5. Lock Haven 6 69 11.50
6. La Salle 5 49 9.80
7. Saint Louis 6 34 5.67
 
GOALS SCORED GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 5 16 3.20
Massachusetts 6 16 2.67
3. Temple 6 11 1.83
4. Saint Joseph's 6 9 1.50
5. La Salle 5 8 1.60
Lock Haven 6 8 1.33
7. Saint Louis 6 5 0.83
 
GOALS SCORED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 5 16 3.20
2. Massachusetts 6 16 2.67
3. Temple 6 11 1.83
4. La Salle 5 8 1.60
5. Saint Joseph's 6 9 1.50
6. Lock Haven 6 8 1.33
7. Saint Louis 6 5 0.83
 
GOALS ALLOWED GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 4 0.67
2. La Salle 5 5 1.00
3. Richmond 5 6 1.20
4. Temple 6 7 1.17
5. Lock Haven 6 10 1.67
6. Saint Louis 6 19 3.17
7. Saint Joseph's 6 22 3.67
 
GOALS ALLOWED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 4 0.67
2. La Salle 5 5 1.00
3. Temple 6 7 1.17
4. Richmond 5 6 1.20
5. Lock Haven 6 10 1.67
6. Saint Louis 6 19 3.17
7. Saint Joseph's 6 22 3.67
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 15 2.50
2. Richmond 5 13 2.60
3. Lock Haven 6 9 1.50
4. La Salle 5 7 1.40
5. Saint Joseph's 6 5 0.83
Temple 6 5 0.83
7. Saint Louis 6 3 0.50
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 5 13 2.60
2. Massachusetts 6 15 2.50
3. Lock Haven 6 9 1.50
4. La Salle 5 7 1.40
5. Temple 6 5 0.83
Saint Joseph's 6 5 0.83
7. Saint Louis 6 3 0.50
 
SAVES GP Saves Avg/G
1. Saint Louis 6 60 10.00
2. Saint Joseph's 6 42 7.00
3. La Salle 5 40 8.00
4. Lock Haven 6 28 4.67
5. Massachusetts 6 27 4.50
6. Temple 6 19 3.17
7. Richmond 5 14 2.80
 
SAVES PER GAME GP Saves Avg/G GA Save%
1. Saint Louis 6 60 10.00 19 .759
2. La Salle 5 40 8.00 5 .889
3. Saint Joseph's 6 42 7.00 22 .656
4. Lock Haven 6 28 4.67 10 .737
5. Massachusetts 6 27 4.50 4 .871
6. Temple 6 19 3.17 7 .731
7. Richmond 5 14 2.80 6 .700
 
PENALTY CORNERS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 6 54 9.00
2. Saint Joseph's 6 52 8.67
3. Temple 6 45 7.50
4. Richmond 5 39 7.80
5. Lock Haven 6 38 6.33
6. La Salle 5 21 4.20
Saint Louis 6 21 3.50
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. Saint Joseph's 6 5 0.83
2. La Salle 5 3 0.60
3. Massachusetts 6 2 0.33
Lock Haven 6 2 0.33
5. Saint Louis 6 1 0.17
6. Temple 6 0 0.00
Richmond 5 0 0.00
 
CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (Conference games only)  
 
Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Massachusetts 5-1-0 .833 16 4   5-1-0 .833 16 4
Richmond 4-1-0 .800 16 6   4-1-0 .800 16 6
Temple 4-2-0 .667 11 7   4-2-0 .667 11 7
La Salle 3-2-0 .600 8 5   3-2-0 .600 8 5
Lock Haven 3-3-0 .500 8 10   3-3-0 .500 8 10
Saint Joseph's 1-5-0 .167 9 22   1-5-0 .167 9 22
Saint Louis 0-6-0 .000 5 19   0-6-0 .000 5 19
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
Richmond 4 4-0-0
Lock Haven 3 3-0-0
La Salle 2 2-0-0
Saint Joseph's 1 1-0-0
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Score-Avg Margin PK-Att Shots Saves Save% Corners
La Salle 5 8-5 1.59-0.99 +0.60 1-2 49 40 88.9 21
Lock Haven 6 8-10 1.25-1.57 -0.31 1-1 69 28 73.7 38
Massachusetts 6 16-4 2.63-0.66 +1.97 1-1 118 27 87.1 54
Richmond 5 16-6 3.36-1.26 +2.10 0-1 79 14 70.0 39
Saint Joseph's 6 9-22 1.44-3.53 -2.09 0-0 86 42 65.6 52
Saint Louis 6 5-19 0.85-3.22 -2.37 1-1 34 60 75.9 21
Temple 6 11-7 1.79-1.14 +0.65 1-1 94 19 73.1 45
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
La Salle 3-575 192   2-585 292   0-0 0   5-1160 232
Lock Haven 3-383 128   3-344 115   0-0 0   6-727 121
Massachusetts 3-498 166   3-616 205   0-0 0   6-1114 186
Richmond 2-265 132   3-663 221   0-0 0   5-928 186
Saint Joseph's 3-718 239   3-465 155   0-0 0   6-1183 197
Saint Louis 3-193 64   3-549 183   0-0 0   6-742 124
Temple 3-1158 386   3-568 189   0-0 0   6-1726 288
 
  INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  
INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS
Through games of Mar 26, 2012 (Conference games only)  
 
To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games,
goalies at least 33.0% of their team's minutes.

SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 25 4.17
SWEIGART, Callie-UM 6 25 4.17
3. YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 20 3.33
4. DOYLE, Therese-SJU 6 19 3.17
TESTA, Theresa-SJU 6 19 3.17
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 19 3.17
7. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 6 17 2.83
ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 17 2.83
MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 6 17 2.83
10. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 16 3.20
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. SWEIGART, Callie-UM 6 25 4.17
SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 25 4.17
3. YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 20 3.33
4. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 16 3.20
5. TESTA, Theresa-SJU 6 19 3.17
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 19 3.17
DOYLE, Therese-SJU 6 19 3.17
8. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 17 2.83
BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 6 17 2.83
MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 6 17 2.83
 
POINTS GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 5 4 14 2.80
2. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 5 1 11 1.83
3. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 4 0 8 1.33
4. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 5 3 1 7 1.40
YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 2 3 7 1.17
6. PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 2 6 1.00
BOWMAN, Lindsay-UM 6 3 0 6 1.00
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 3 0 6 1.00
AHERN, Leslie-LHU 6 1 4 6 1.00
MACDONNELL, Molly-UM 6 3 0 6 1.00
 
POINTS PER GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 5 4 14 2.80
2. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 5 1 11 1.83
3. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 5 3 1 7 1.40
4. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 4 0 8 1.33
5. YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 2 3 7 1.17
6. PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 2 6 1.00
BOWMAN, Lindsay-UM 6 3 0 6 1.00
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 3 0 6 1.00
AHERN, Leslie-LHU 6 1 4 6 1.00
MACDONNELL, Molly-UM 6 3 0 6 1.00
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 5 2 1 5 1.00
DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 5 1 3 5 1.00
KEMPF, Colleen-LAS 4 2 0 4 1.00
 
GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 5 1.00
SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 5 0.83
3. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 4 0.67
4. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 5 3 0.60
MACDONNELL, Molly-UM 6 3 0.50
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 3 0.50
BOWMAN, Lindsay-UM 6 3 0.50
8. KEMPF, Colleen-LAS 4 2 0.50
FRY, Lindsay-LAS 5 2 0.40
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 5 2 0.40
SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 5 2 0.40
OSTOICH, Samantha-UR 5 2 0.40
AMOROSE, Christina-UR 5 2 0.40
KENT, Nicole-SLU 6 2 0.33
BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 6 2 0.33
DOYLE, Therese-SJU 6 2 0.33
PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 0.33
YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 2 0.33
 
GOALS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 5 1.00
2. SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 5 0.83
3. ROWE, Ellen-SJU 6 4 0.67
4. BARRY, Rebecca-UR 5 3 0.60
5. MACDONNELL, Molly-UM 6 3 0.50
BOWMAN, Lindsay-UM 6 3 0.50
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 3 0.50
KEMPF, Colleen-LAS 4 2 0.50
9. SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 5 2 0.40
AMOROSE, Christina-UR 5 2 0.40
OSTOICH, Samantha-UR 5 2 0.40
FRY, Lindsay-LAS 5 2 0.40
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 5 2 0.40
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. PAPA, Mariel-LAS 5 4 0.80
PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 4 0.80
AHERN, Leslie-LHU 6 4 0.67
4. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 5 3 0.60
YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 3 0.50
SWEIGART, Callie-UM 6 3 0.50
7. CHYLACK, Becca-LAS 5 2 0.40
SCHNUCK, Liesl-UR 5 2 0.40
HASAN, Najia-LHU 6 2 0.33
KEENER, Kaylee-TU 6 2 0.33
WEAKNECHT, Nicole-LHU 6 2 0.33
CUTRY, Christine-UM 6 2 0.33
SIKALIS, Alexa-UM 6 2 0.33
PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 0.33
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 4 0.80
PAPA, Mariel-LAS 5 4 0.80
3. AHERN, Leslie-LHU 6 4 0.67
4. DAVIES, Chelsea-UR 5 3 0.60
5. YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 3 0.50
SWEIGART, Callie-UM 6 3 0.50
7. CHYLACK, Becca-LAS 5 2 0.40
SCHNUCK, Liesl-UR 5 2 0.40
9. CUTRY, Christine-UM 6 2 0.33
SIKALIS, Alexa-UM 6 2 0.33
WEAKNECHT, Nicole-LHU 6 2 0.33
KEENER, Kaylee-TU 6 2 0.33
PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 0.33
HASAN, Najia-LHU 6 2 0.33
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. AMOROSE, Christina-UR 5 2 0.40
SETTLES, Bridget-TU 6 2 0.33
PANCIOCCO, Nikki-UM 6 2 0.33
4. KEMPF, Colleen-LAS 4 1 0.25
PETERSON, Katelin-UR 5 1 0.20
FRY, Lindsay-LAS 5 1 0.20
EVANS, Megan-LHU 5 1 0.20
SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 5 1 0.20
OSTOICH, Samantha-UR 5 1 0.20
LAMBRIGHT, Caryn-TU 6 1 0.17
MACDONNELL, Molly-UM 6 1 0.17
YOUNG, Kim-UM 6 1 0.17
HEINEMAN, Kate-UM 6 1 0.17
TESTA, Theresa-SJU 6 1 0.17
BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 6 1 0.17
AHERN, Leslie-LHU 6 1 0.17
SHEPPS, Kristi-LHU 6 1 0.17
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. HOOVER, Abby-SJU 6 3 0.50
2. LEAMAN, Olivia-LAS 5 2 0.40
ALLYMOHAMED, Lauren-UM 6 2 0.33
4. WALSH, Katie-SJU 1 1 1.00
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 5 1 0.20
DEANER, Jessica-LAS 5 1 0.20
SMITH, Lisa-SLU 6 1 0.17
KOLOBIELSKI, Sara-SJU 6 1 0.17
RHULE, Beverly-LHU 6 1 0.17
 
SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 6 57 9.50
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 37 7.40
3. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 6 26 4.33
4. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 25 4.17
5. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 4 19 4.75
MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 19 3.17
7. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 14 2.80
8. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 2 12 6.00
9. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 4 8 2.00
10. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 1 1 1.00
 
SAVES PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 6 57 9.50
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 37 7.40
3. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 4 19 4.75
4. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 6 26 4.33
5. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 25 4.17
6. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 19 3.17
7. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 14 2.80
8. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 4 8 2.00
 
SHUTOUTS GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 2 0.33
SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 2 0.40
ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 2 0.40
4. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 1 0.17
 
SHUTOUTS PER GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 2 0.40
ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 2 0.40
3. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 2 0.33
4. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 1 0.17
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 4 426:07 0.66
2. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 4 2 208:23 0.67
3. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 5 352:39 0.99
4. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 7 429:32 1.14
5. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 6 333:24 1.26
6. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 4 8 238:04 2.35
7. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 6 15 366:11 2.87
8. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 6 17 410:56 2.90
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 5 37 5 .881
2. WIDDALL, Alesha-UM 6 25 4 .862
3. STAUFENBERG, Lindsay-LHU 4 8 2 .800
4. AMBROSE, Megan-SLU 6 57 17 .770
5. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 6 19 7 .731
6. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 4 19 8 .704
7. ZARKOSKI, Anna-UR 5 14 6 .700
8. MESSAROS, Liz-SJU 6 26 15 .634
 
Team Identification Team ID
La Salle LAS
Lock Haven LHU
Massachusetts UM
Richmond UR
Saint Joseph's SJU
Saint Louis SLU
Temple TU