Atlantic 10 Conference

Overall Statistics
  CONFERENCE FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  

SCORING MARGIN GP Offense Defense Margin
1. Richmond 21 2.90 1.43 1.48
2. Massachusetts 24 2.86 1.69 1.17
3. VCU 19 2.24 1.77 0.47
4. Temple 21 2.92 2.83 0.09
5. Lock Haven 20 1.89 1.89 0.00
6. La Salle 19 1.78 2.83 -1.05
7. Saint Joseph's 19 1.09 2.76 -1.67
8. Saint Louis 20 1.10 3.80 -2.70
 
SCORING AVERAGE GP Goals Minutes Avg.
1. Temple 21 62 1485:40 2.92
2. Richmond 21 61 1470:46 2.90
3. Massachusetts 24 71 1739:11 2.86
4. VCU 19 43 1344:57 2.24
5. Lock Haven 20 39 1442:53 1.89
6. La Salle 19 34 1336:15 1.78
7. Saint Louis 20 22 1400:00 1.10
8. Saint Joseph's 19 21 1343:50 1.09
 
SHUTOUTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 21 7 0.33
2. La Salle 19 5 0.26
3. VCU 19 3 0.16
Massachusetts 24 3 0.12
5. Lock Haven 20 2 0.10
6. Saint Joseph's 19 1 0.05
7. Saint Louis 20 0 0.00
Temple 21 0 0.00
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg.
1. Richmond 21 30 1470:46 1.43
2. Massachusetts 24 42 1739:11 1.69
3. VCU 19 34 1344:57 1.77
4. Lock Haven 20 39 1442:53 1.89
5. Saint Joseph's 19 53 1343:50 2.76
6. Temple 21 60 1485:40 2.83
7. La Salle 19 54 1336:15 2.83
8. Saint Louis 20 76 1400:00 3.80
 
SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 352 14.67
2. Temple 21 302 14.38
3. Richmond 21 297 14.14
4. Lock Haven 20 234 11.70
5. La Salle 19 229 12.05
6. VCU 19 212 11.16
7. Saint Joseph's 19 208 10.95
8. Saint Louis 20 159 7.95
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 352 14.67
2. Temple 21 302 14.38
3. Richmond 21 297 14.14
4. La Salle 19 229 12.05
5. Lock Haven 20 234 11.70
6. VCU 19 212 11.16
7. Saint Joseph's 19 208 10.95
8. Saint Louis 20 159 7.95
 
GOALS SCORED GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 71 2.96
2. Temple 21 62 2.95
3. Richmond 21 61 2.90
4. VCU 19 43 2.26
5. Lock Haven 20 39 1.95
6. La Salle 19 34 1.79
7. Saint Louis 20 22 1.10
8. Saint Joseph's 19 21 1.11
 
GOALS SCORED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 71 2.96
2. Temple 21 62 2.95
3. Richmond 21 61 2.90
4. VCU 19 43 2.26
5. Lock Haven 20 39 1.95
6. La Salle 19 34 1.79
7. Saint Joseph's 19 21 1.11
8. Saint Louis 20 22 1.10
 
GOALS ALLOWED GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 21 30 1.43
2. VCU 19 34 1.79
3. Lock Haven 20 39 1.95
4. Massachusetts 24 42 1.75
5. Saint Joseph's 19 53 2.79
6. La Salle 19 54 2.84
7. Temple 21 60 2.86
8. Saint Louis 20 76 3.80
 
GOALS ALLOWED/GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Richmond 21 30 1.43
2. Massachusetts 24 42 1.75
3. VCU 19 34 1.79
4. Lock Haven 20 39 1.95
5. Saint Joseph's 19 53 2.79
6. La Salle 19 54 2.84
7. Temple 21 60 2.86
8. Saint Louis 20 76 3.80
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 64 2.67
2. Temple 21 47 2.24
3. Richmond 21 39 1.86
4. VCU 19 36 1.89
5. Lock Haven 20 28 1.40
6. La Salle 19 24 1.26
7. Saint Joseph's 19 18 0.95
8. Saint Louis 20 16 0.80
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 64 2.67
2. Temple 21 47 2.24
3. VCU 19 36 1.89
4. Richmond 21 39 1.86
5. Lock Haven 20 28 1.40
6. La Salle 19 24 1.26
7. Saint Joseph's 19 18 0.95
8. Saint Louis 20 16 0.80
 
SAVES GP Saves Avg/G
1. Saint Joseph's 19 153 8.05
2. La Salle 19 143 7.53
3. Lock Haven 20 126 6.30
4. Saint Louis 20 123 6.15
5. Massachusetts 24 115 4.79
Temple 21 115 5.48
7. VCU 19 106 5.58
8. Richmond 21 60 2.86
 
SAVES PER GAME GP Saves Avg/G GA Save%
1. Saint Joseph's 19 153 8.05 53 .743
2. La Salle 19 143 7.53 54 .726
3. Lock Haven 20 126 6.30 39 .764
4. Saint Louis 20 123 6.15 76 .618
5. VCU 19 106 5.58 34 .757
6. Temple 21 115 5.48 60 .657
7. Massachusetts 24 115 4.79 42 .732
8. Richmond 21 60 2.86 30 .667
 
PENALTY CORNERS GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 145 6.04
2. Lock Haven 20 138 6.90
3. Saint Joseph's 19 133 7.00
4. Richmond 21 120 5.71
5. VCU 19 117 6.16
6. Temple 21 115 5.48
7. La Salle 19 114 6.00
8. Saint Louis 20 105 5.25
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. Massachusetts 24 15 0.62
2. La Salle 19 8 0.42
Temple 21 8 0.38
4. Lock Haven 20 7 0.35
Saint Joseph's 19 7 0.37
6. Saint Louis 20 5 0.25
7. Richmond 21 2 0.10
8. VCU 19 0 0.00
 

Standings Conference Pct. GF GA   Overall Pct. GF GA
Richmond 7-0 1.000 21 5   16-5 .762 61 30
Massachusetts 6-1 .857 26 6   15-9 .625 71 42
Temple 5-2 .714 19 15   12-9 .571 62 60
VCU 4-3 .571 11 10   13-6 .684 43 34
La Salle 3-4 .429 10 14   8-11 .421 34 54
Lock Haven 2-5 .286 10 14   11-9 .550 39 39
Saint Joseph's 1-6 .143 5 17   4-15 .211 21 53
Saint Louis 0-7 .000 6 27   1-19 .050 22 76
 
Current unbeaten streak No. Record in streak
 
Team Summaries GP GF-GA Score-Avg Margin PK-Att Shots Saves Save% Corners
La Salle 19 34-54 1.78-2.83 -1.05 0-1 229 143 72.6 114
Lock Haven 20 39-39 1.89-1.89 +0.00 0-1 234 126 76.4 138
Massachusetts 24 71-42 2.86-1.69 +1.17 2-4 352 115 73.2 145
Richmond 21 61-30 2.90-1.43 +1.48 2-4 297 60 66.7 120
Saint Joseph's 19 21-53 1.09-2.76 -1.67 1-2 208 153 74.3 133
Saint Louis 20 22-76 1.10-3.80 -2.70 0-1 159 123 61.8 105
Temple 21 62-60 2.92-2.83 +0.09 2-3 302 115 65.7 115
VCU 19 43-34 2.24-1.77 +0.47 2-2 212 106 75.7 117
 
Attendance Home Average   Away Average   Neutral Average   Total Average
La Salle 9-1500 167   9-1483 165   1-66 66   19-3049 160
Lock Haven 11-1913 174   8-1985 248   1-42 42   20-3940 197
Massachusetts 14-3857 276   7-2328 333   3-1491 497   24-7676 320
Richmond 9-1944 216   11-2461 224   1-0 0   21-4405 210
Saint Joseph's 12-3359 280   7-1235 176   0-0 0   19-4594 242
Saint Louis 7-907 130   10-2131 213   3-160 53   20-3198 160
Temple 12-3470 289   9-1893 210   0-0 0   21-5363 255
VCU 6-2024 337   11-2204 200   2-95 48   19-4323 228
Totals 80-18974 237   72-15720 218   11-1854 169   163-36548 224  
 
  INDIVIDUAL FIELD HOCKEY STATISTICS  

To be ranked, a player must appear in at least 50.0% of their team's games,
goalies at least 33.0% of their team's minutes.

SHOTS GP No. Avg/G
1. MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 18 80 4.44
2. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 20 76 3.80
3. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 72 3.43
4. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 71 3.38
5. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 70 3.68
Young, Kim-UM 24 70 2.92
7. SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 69 3.83
8. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 65 3.10
9. GERDES, Nicole-SJU 19 64 3.37
10. Zono, Thando-UM 18 62 3.44
 
SHOTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. MARTIN, Jordan-SJU 18 80 4.44
2. SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 69 3.83
3. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 20 76 3.80
4. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 70 3.68
5. Zono, Thando-UM 18 62 3.44
6. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 72 3.43
7. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 71 3.38
8. GERDES, Nicole-SJU 19 64 3.37
9. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 65 3.10
10. Young, Kim-UM 24 70 2.92
 
POINTS GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 22 10 54 2.57
2. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 18 9 45 2.14
3. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 16 9 41 2.16
4. Zono, Thando-UM 18 14 5 33 1.83
Young, Kim-UM 24 13 7 33 1.38
6. Cordero, Nicole-UM 24 14 1 29 1.21
7. KROENER, Nicole-TU 21 8 10 26 1.24
8. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 7 11 25 1.19
DEITRICK,Taylor-UR 21 12 1 25 1.19
10. HUNT, Lauren-TU 21 9 5 23 1.10
 
POINTS PER GAME GP Goals Assists Points Avg/G
1. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 22 10 54 2.57
2. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 16 9 41 2.16
3. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 18 9 45 2.14
4. Zono, Thando-UM 18 14 5 33 1.83
5. Young, Kim-UM 24 13 7 33 1.38
6. KROENER, Nicole-TU 21 8 10 26 1.24
7. Cordero, Nicole-UM 24 14 1 29 1.21
8. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 7 11 25 1.19
DEITRICK,Taylor-UR 21 12 1 25 1.19
10. HUNT, Lauren-TU 21 9 5 23 1.10
 
GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 22 1.05
2. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 18 0.86
3. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 16 0.84
4. Zono, Thando-UM 18 14 0.78
Cordero, Nicole-UM 24 14 0.58
6. Young, Kim-UM 24 13 0.54
7. DEITRICK,Taylor-UR 21 12 0.57
8. SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 9 0.50
HUNT, Lauren-TU 21 9 0.43
DELP, Alyssa-TU 21 9 0.43
 
GOALS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 22 1.05
2. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 18 0.86
3. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 16 0.84
4. Zono, Thando-UM 18 14 0.78
5. Cordero, Nicole-UM 24 14 0.58
6. DEITRICK,Taylor-UR 21 12 0.57
7. Young, Kim-UM 24 13 0.54
8. SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 9 0.50
9. HUNT, Lauren-TU 21 9 0.43
DELP, Alyssa-TU 21 9 0.43
 
ASSISTS GP No. Avg/G
1. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 11 0.52
Sweigart, Callie-UM 24 11 0.46
3. DOWNES, Nakira-LHU 19 10 0.53
YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 10 0.48
KROENER, Nicole-TU 21 10 0.48
Heineman, Kate-UM 24 10 0.42
7. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 9 0.47
BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 9 0.43
9. HILL, Chelsea-VCU 19 8 0.42
10. Young, Kim-UM 24 7 0.29
 
ASSISTS PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. DOWNES, Nakira-LHU 19 10 0.53
2. BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 11 0.52
3. YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 10 0.48
KROENER, Nicole-TU 21 10 0.48
5. SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 9 0.47
6. Sweigart, Callie-UM 24 11 0.46
7. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 9 0.43
8. HILL, Chelsea-VCU 19 8 0.42
9. Heineman, Kate-UM 24 10 0.42
10. DEMASI, Stephanie-VCU 19 6 0.32
PAUKOVITS, Janel-LAS 19 6 0.32
KUMAR, Neelam-LAS 19 6 0.32
 
GAME-WINNING GOALS GP No. Avg/G
1. BARRY,Rebecca-UR 21 9 0.43
2. HARSH, Kelly-LHU 20 4 0.20
YOUTZ, Amber-TU 21 4 0.19
4. Zono, Thando-UM 18 3 0.17
SHOEMAKER, Olivia-LAS 18 3 0.17
SCHERRER, Kelsey-VCU 19 3 0.16
DELP, Alyssa-TU 21 3 0.14
Young, Kim-UM 24 3 0.12
 
DEFENSIVE SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. RHULE, Beverly-LHU 14 4 0.29
LEAMAN, Olivia-LAS 19 4 0.21
HOOVER, Abby-SJU 19 4 0.21
Prince, Hannah-UM 24 4 0.17
5. SMITH, Lisa-SLU 19 3 0.16
Heineman, Kate-UM 24 3 0.12
Allymohamed, Lauren-UM 24 3 0.12
8. Zono, Thando-UM 18 2 0.11
BARRETTA, Heather-LAS 19 2 0.11
PAUKOVITS, Janel-LAS 19 2 0.11
GEKAS, Eva-SJU 19 2 0.11
HARSH, Kelly-LHU 20 2 0.10
DOYLE, Molly-TU 20 2 0.10
BRIGLIA, Katie-TU 21 2 0.10
SHRONK, Taylor-TU 21 2 0.10
STEINMAN, Rachel-TU 21 2 0.10
OSTOICH,Catherine-UR 21 2 0.10
Sweigart, Callie-UM 24 2 0.08
 
SAVES GP No. Avg/G
1. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 135 7.11
SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 135 7.11
3. BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 106 5.58
4. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 100 4.35
5. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 21 96 4.57
6. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 16 73 4.56
7. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 63 5.25
8. WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 59 4.54
9. WESTHEAD, Tori-SLU 10 47 4.70
10. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 46 2.71
 
SAVES PER GAME GP No. Avg/G
1. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 135 7.11
SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 135 7.11
3. BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 106 5.58
4. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 63 5.25
5. WESTHEAD, Tori-SLU 10 47 4.70
6. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 21 96 4.57
7. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 16 73 4.56
8. WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 59 4.54
9. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 100 4.35
10. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 46 2.71
 
SHUTOUTS GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 6 0.35
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 5 0.26
3. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 3 0.13
BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 3 0.16
5. WENTLING,Kelley-UR 5 1 0.20
WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 1 0.08
MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 1 0.08
MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 1 0.05
 
SHUTOUTS PER GAME GP Shutouts Sho/G
1. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 6 0.35
2. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 5 0.26
3. BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 3 0.16
4. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 3 0.13
5. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 1 0.08
6. WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 1 0.08
7. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 1 0.05
 
GOALS AGAINST AVG GP GA Minutes GA Avg
1. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 23 1155:46 1.39
2. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 38 1610:07 1.65
3. BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 34 1343:15 1.77
4. WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 17 665:14 1.79
5. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 22 777:39 1.98
6. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 48 1241:58 2.71
7. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 52 1321:10 2.76
8. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 21 55 1296:57 2.97
9. WESTHEAD, Tori-SLU 10 24 521:43 3.22
10. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 16 52 878:17 4.14
 
SAVE PERCENTAGE GP Saves GA Save Pct.
1. WHITE, Elaina-LHU 13 59 17 .776
2. BOTTERI, Megan-VCU 19 106 34 .757
3. MOLL, Kelsey-LHU 12 63 22 .741
4. MITCHELL, Kate-SJU 19 135 48 .738
5. Carlino, Sam-UM 23 100 38 .725
6. SHAFFER, Lisa-LAS 19 135 52 .722
7. ZARKOSKI,Anna-UR 17 46 23 .667
8. WESTHEAD, Tori-SLU 10 47 24 .662
9. MILLEN, Lizzy-TU 21 96 55 .636
10. DEPEW-BRADY, Megan-SLU 16 73 52 .584
 
Team Identification Team ID
La Salle LAS
Lock Haven LHU
Massachusetts UM
Richmond UR
Saint Joseph's SJU
Saint Louis SLU
Temple TU
VCU VCU